CAT Slot 2 Analysis 2024 – Difficulty Level, Expected Cutoffs, Types of Questions
The second slot of CAT 2024 was held during the afternoon of 24th November 2024 from 12:30 pm to 2:30 pm. Some changes in the exam pattern were expected from CAT 2024, and as news from our students who sat for the first slot poured in, these expectations were proven right. Go through the full CAT slot 2 analysis 2024 to get a better understanding of how it turned out.
CAT Slot 2 analysis 2024 – Overall
The Second slot of CAT 2024 took place today between 12.30 and 2:30 pm.
The structure of CAT 2024 underwent several changes compared to 2023, with a total of 68 questions. As per our CAT slot 2 analysis, the Verbal Ability (VA) and Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning (DILR) sections experienced modifications in segmentation and the distribution of MCQs and TITA (Type In The Answer) questions. The Verbal section saw the complete removal of Paragraph Jumble questions. Instead, it featured 3 Summary (MCQ) questions, 3 Paragraph Completion (MCQ) questions, and 2 Odd Sentence (TITA) questions.
The DILR section, which had 22 questions in total, had 22 sets, which increased from 4 to 5. This included 2 sets with 5 questions each and 3 sets with 4 questions each. The DILR section was significantly easier compared to the previous year in both slots today.
Section No. | Section Name | Duration | MCQs | TITA | Total |
I | VARC | 40 min | 22 | 2 | 24 |
II | DI and LR | 40 min | 12 | 10 | 22 |
III | QA | 40 min | 14 | 8 | 22 |
Total | 120 min | 46 | 22 | 68 |
The marking scheme was +3 for every correct and -1 for incorrect. There was no negative marking for TITA Qs.
Based on the feedback received from several candidates who have appeared in the second slot, our initial estimate of the percentiles and scores*** is as follows. These estimates will be suitably revised soon after the CAT releases the response sheets.
Read our overall CAT exam analysis and analyses for the other slots here:
Read More – Overall CAT Exam Analysis – Difficulty Level, Expected Cutoffs, Types of Questions
Read More – CAT 2024 Slot 1 Analysis – Difficulty level, expected cutoffs
Read More – CAT 2024 Slot 3 Analysis – Difficulty level, expected cutoffs
CAT slot 2 analysis 2024 – Expected percentile vs score
Percentile | VARC Score | DILR Score | QA Score | Overall |
99.9 | 50 | 46 | 46 | 118-123 |
99.5 | 42 | 40 | 41 | 103-108 |
99 | 38 | 37 | 33 | 92-95 |
98 | 28 | 30 | 22 | 69-72 |
95 | 23 | 27 | 16 | 57-59 |
90 | 20 | 21 | 13 | 47-49 |
85 | 18 | 19 | 12 | 42-44 |
80 | 15 | 17 | 10 | 39-40 |
75 | 14 | 14 | 9 | 34-36 |
Read More – Download Your CAT Answer Key and Response Sheet Here
Read More – CAT Score vs Percentile – Updated for CAT 2024
*** Students are advised not to take any B-School application decision based on these initial estimates. They serve only as the first indicator of likely performance.
CAT slot 1 analysis 2024 – Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC)
As per our CAT slot 2 analysis, the VA-RC section consisted of 16 Reading Comprehension questions and 8 Verbal Ability questions. As in the past several years, there were no direct Grammar or Vocabulary questions. Two of the passages were easy to moderate. The passages on Peer Review of Research and Carnivore-Human Conflict required more careful reading. About 11 or 12 RC questions could be attempted with high accuracy. There were no jumbled paragraph questions. One additional paragraph completion question and one summary question replaced the two jumbled paragraphs. So, the section had 3 questions each of Summary (MCQ) and Paragraph Completion(MCQ), and two Odd Sentence questions (TITA). In VA, 4 or 5 attempts with high accuracy were possible. Overall, the section was moderate and comparable to Slot 1 VARC, and SimCAT 16.
Area / Questions | No of Qs. | Type | LOD |
Reading Comprehension | 16 | MCQ | Overall: Medium |
RC-1: Spice Trade | 4 | MCQ | Easy to Medium |
RC-2: Unintended Consequences of Technology | 4 | MCQ | Easy to Medium |
RC-3: Peer Review of Research | 4 | MCQ | Medium |
RC-4: Carnivore-Human Conflict | 4 | MCQ | Medium |
Verbal Ability | 08 | MCQ & TITA | Overall: Medium |
Paragraph completion | 3 | MCQ | 3 Medium |
Summary | 3 | MCQ | 1 Easy, 1 Medium, 1 Difficult |
Odd Sentence Questions | 2 | TITA | 1 Easy, 1 Medium |
An attempt of 12 or 13 questions with an accuracy of approximately 60% will fetch around 85% ile score in VARC.
An attempt of 15 or 16 questions with an accuracy of approximately 65-70% will fetch 95+ percentiles in VARC.
CAT slot 1 analysis 2024 – Data Interpretation and Logical Reasoning (DILR)
Last year, there were four sets, each comprising five questions. This pattern has been changed in CAT 2024, as per our CAT slot 2 analysis. There were two sets with five questions each and three sets with four questions each.
Overall, the section’s Level of difficulty was Medium, and it was relatively easier than the DILR Section of Slot 2 of CAT 2023. Some students mentioned that one question had two options that were the same.
Set No. | Area | Set Description | No. of Questions | Question Type | LOD |
Data Interpretation and Logical Reasoning | 22 | MCQ and TITA | Easy to Medium | ||
1 | Logical Reasoning | Rating – 8 Gymnasts | 5 | 2 MCQ 3 TITA |
Easy – Medium |
2 | Data Interpretation | 6 firms, PAT, Es, PRD – 2 graphs | 4 | 4 MCQ 0 TITA |
Easy |
3 | Logical Reasoning | Schematic diagram of walkways – Lake | 4 | 2 MCQ, 2 TITA | Medium |
4 | Logical Reasoning | 1 to 10 numbers to be arranged in 10 slots with conditions | 5 | 2 MCQ, 3 TITA | Medium to Difficult |
5 | Data Interpretation | eCommerce rating distribution – cumulative | 4 | 2 MCQ, 2 TITA | Easy |
An attempt of 9 or 10 questions with an accuracy of approximately 80% will fetch an 85% ile score in DILR.
An attempt of 13 or 14 questions with an accuracy of approximately 85% will fetch 95 + percentiles in DILR.
CAT slot 1 analysis 2024 – Quantitative Ability (QA)
Our CAT slot 2 analysis revealed that this section was comparatively easier (in terms of level of difficulty) as compared to last year’s slots and was dominated by Arithmetic (8 questions), followed by Algebra (5 questions). There were 3 questions on Geometry, 3 questions on Modern Math and 3 on Numbers. In Arithmetic, the questions were on SICI, Time and Work, Time-Speed-Distance, Ratio Proportion, Mixtures & Alligations, and Profit & Loss. In Algebra, the questions were from Quadratic equations, Inequality, Modulus, Functions, and Identity-based questions etc. In Modern Math, the questions were on Logarithms, Sequences, Permutations etc. In Geometry, the questions were on circles, triangles in trapezium coordinate geometry, etc. In the number system, there were questions on remainders, Indices, and Surds. There were reports of the same question from last year, slot 3
Number of TITA (8 questions) and MCQ (14 questions) in this section.
Area/Q Type | No of Questions |
Quantitative Ability | 14 MCQs, 8 TITA Overall LOD: MEDIUM |
Arithmetic | 8 |
Algebra | 5 |
Geometry | 3 |
Modern Math | 3 |
Numbers | 3 |
Attempting the right questions was the key.
An attempt of 6 or 7 questions with an accuracy of approximately 80% will fetch an 85% ile score in QA.
An attempt of 8 or 9 questions with an accuracy of approximately 80% will fetch 95 + percentiles in QA.
CAT slot 1 analysis – Conclusion
At many centres, shoes and metallic objects (including metal jewellery) were not allowed. Only the admit card and ID proof were allowed. As in previous years, the authorities took possession of the admit cards. The candidates were given a small pad with the IIM CAT Logo on the cover for rough work and a pen—which were also taken away at the end of the exam.
The test interface was user-friendly and exactly the one provided in the official CAT Mock Test. A simple calculator was provided, and not a scientific one. There was an arrow provided near the question palette, which, when clicked, expanded the question window to full-screen view by hiding the question palette & vice versa
At the end of the test, a summary of the number of questions attempted, visited, and not visited for each section was displayed.
There was a button marked ‘Question Paper’ that opened up a screen containing all the questions of the section. This was used by students for planning their approach for the section.
According to our CAT slot 2 analysis, it was a little trickier than slot 1, although the overall difficulty level remained below expectations. Compared to slot 3, slot 2 presented slightly easier questions. We’ll continue to update the data here as more information pours in.
*** The scores and percentiles mentioned in this analysis are indicators based on the feedback from students and IMS experts. They are in no way related to the results which IIMs are expected to declare in January 2025. You are advised to wait for the results.